China Imposes Travel Limits on AI Workers at Private Firms: Report

China is reportedly requiring some senior AI workers at private firms including Alibaba and DeepSeek to obtain approval before traveling abroad, tightening state control over a key part of the country’s technology sector.

The restrictions apply to startup founders, researchers, and executives considered important to China’s AI ambitions, with authorities adding people to the list based on their strategic value rather than their seniority or employer, according to a Tuesday Bloomberg report citing people familiar with the matter.

Questions remain, however, over how many workers could be affected, which roles qualify, and how broadly the curbs apply across China’s AI industry. Some private-sector AI workers had previously been required to report overseas travel plans, though not necessarily to seek approval before leaving the country, per the report.

Those reported curbs follow other signs of tighter state control over China-linked AI firms.

Last month, Beijing ordered Meta to unwind its $2 billion acquisition of Manus, an AI startup that began in China before relocating to Singapore. China has also moved to reduce reliance on U.S. AI chips, pushing domestic firms toward Huawei and other local alternatives.

DeepSeek, one of the firms named in the report, has drawn scrutiny, with the Trump administration weighing restrictions against the Chinese AI startup over national security concerns.

A wider return flow of Chinese scientists and engineers in AI and semiconductors has also accelerated, per reports from SCMP. Those cases include semiconductor researcher Da Bo’s return to China after work tied to TSMC’s 3nm plant in Japan, and Oxford-trained AI chip researcher Song Yuhang joining Nanjing University’s School of Artificial Intelligence.

‘Reverse brain drain’

The reported curbs complicate China’s “reverse brain drain” narrative, Joshua Chu, lawyer, lecturer, and co-chair of the Hong Kong Web3 Association, told Decrypt.

Returning chip and AI researchers have been framed as proof that Beijing can bring elite talent home with money, titles, and prestige, he noted.

For frontier AI and semiconductor researchers at Chinese firms, travel has become part of the state’s security calculus, Chu explained.

Their passports and conference schedules can be treated as “national security variables” when Beijing worries about technology leakage, he added, pointing to how this could blur the line between private enterprise and the state, while recasting the bargain for talent returning to China.

Top scientists and engineers once moved through a more open global economy after the Cold War, Chu observed.

The fact that exit controls for private-sector AI talent are being discussed in 2026 suggests that, for some countries, “the logic of keeping human capital ‘in’ is starting to win out over the logic of letting ideas and people flow freely,” he added.